Skip to main content

Michael Saltzstein on Global Risk Management in Times of Conflict

Michael Saltzstein believes risk management is critical to both successful business practices and successful military operations during a time of conflict between nations. Although the danger is inherent in many military duties, planning for operational contingencies can reduce risks and save lives. Moreover, mitigating risk in a coalition environment is even more critical because the scenarios that planners must consider are complicated by various policies, equipment, training, and security procedures.

 

According to Forrester Research, Inc. analysts, the ramifications of the Russia-Ukraine friction are reverberating in global markets. Risk management leaders worldwide are already, or will soon be, dealing with the impact of the conflict and sanctions. AM Best reported that the industry's indirect exposure could be significant.

 

First Steps Toward Loss Prevention

According to Michael Saltzstein, the first step for commercial policyholders with business units exposed to the conflict zone should be to plan to maintain resilience for those divisions. It must include risk managers meeting with chief security officers and IT leaders to assess whether they rely on technology suppliers in the impacted regions and evaluate their ability to switch suppliers if necessary. You should review business continuity plans, supply chain arrangements, and alternative third-party vendors. Additionally, executives should have the authority to make quick decisions on alternative suppliers if the need arises.

 

Furthermore, according to Forrester's analysis, businesses should brace themselves for additional supply chain bottlenecks, as sanctions and other disruptions might wreak havoc on supply chains over the next 24 months. These issues are expected to manifest through higher fuel prices, possible shortages, and increased freight and travel costs.

 

After considering the business units at risk and the supply chain, Michael Saltzstein advises risk managers to pay attention to the changing situation, particularly those that may necessitate changes to third-party vendors. In addition, as analysts expect more sanctions, it is best to be proactive in screening third-party partnerships, including direct partners, foreign affiliates, and customers.

 

Furthermore, it would be good to prioritize geopolitical instability in the enterprise risk management plan. It should consider all the new geopolitical risks, and the impact analysis should include potential conflict and its aftereffects.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Saltzstein Explores Practical Ways to Help Families Displaced by Wildfires

  Michael Saltzstein on How to Support Families Affected by Wildfires Wildfires often displace thousands of families, leaving them with little more than the clothes on their backs. The immediate aftermath of such disasters is challenging, with families facing the loss of homes, possessions, and a sense of security. Michael Saltzstein explains that w hile the road to recovery is long, communities and individuals can play a vital role in supporting those affected. From donating essential items to offering emotional assistance , there are many meaningful ways to help families displaced by wildfires.     Donate Essentials and Financial Aid   One of the most immediate needs for displaced families is access to essentials like clothing, food, and hygiene products. Local shelters and disaster relief organizations, such as the American Red Cross or local food banks, often coordinate donation drives to provide these necessities.     1. Financial Contributions  ...

Michael Saltzstein Highlights Why Employees Create Silent Workarounds When Processes Don’t Work

    Michael Saltzstein Reveals How Silent Workarounds Reveal Deeper Process Failures In many workplaces, broken systems stick around not because no one notices, but because no one feels comfortable speaking up. Instead of raising concerns or challenging inefficient processes, employees often create quiet workarounds just to keep things moving. As Michael Saltzstein points out, these behind-the-scenes fixes aren’t signs of creativity or resilience. They are red flags that something important is missing, which is psychological safety.     A workaround may be as simple as using an unofficial spreadsheet instead of a clunky CRM or copying a coworker’s workflow to avoid dealing with red tape. While these silent fixes keep daily operations from stalling, they also mask inefficiencies and prevent systemic improvement.     Why Employees Stay Silent   The silence surrounding broken processes often stems from fear of being seen as negative, resistant, or difficul...

Michael Saltzstein Explains How Cognitive Load and Decision Fatigue Hurt Workplace Productivity

  Michael Saltzstein on Cognitive Overload at Work Can Lead to Decision Fatigue Modern workplaces are filled with tasks, notifications and decisions that demand constant attention. While this environment may seem like a mark of efficiency, Michael Saltzstein mentions that it often masks a hidden cost: cognitive load and decision fatigue. These two psychological phenomena can silently erode productivity, well-being, and the ability to make sound choices throughout the workday.     Cognitive load refers to the mental effort required to process information and complete tasks. When this load becomes excessive, it overwhelms an employee’s ability to think clearly and retain important details . Combine this with the endless decisions many workers must make each day, from responding to emails to prioritizing meetings , and you have a recipe for burnout and poor judgment.     Decision Fatigue Builds Quietly   The average adult makes thousands of decisions dai...