Skip to main content

Michael Saltzstein on Uniting Risk Management with Strategic Planning

Michael Saltzstein believes the ever-changing and ever-expanding needs of a business necessitate a thorough rethinking of the risk management process. A recent update to the COSO's enterprise risk management (ERM) framework offers new ideas on how companies can preserve their business's value, if not enhance it, by incorporating and examining risks from the strategy formulation stage.

 

This approach elevates ERM from an operational- and compliance-focused information-gathering and reporting model to a strategy-focused model that can add value to organizations. However, implementing the change is a challenge in and of itself, as organizations, particularly larger ones, are hesitant to redefine their existing ERM process without a precise cost/benefit analysis that demonstrates added value.

 

As Michael Saltzstein indicates, it’s important to address how risk management professionals can persuade decision-makers to incorporate risk management insights identified through the organization's ERM process into strategic planning.

 

Many would agree that adopting more sophisticated ERM systems improves corporate governance. In addition, there is a direct correlation between the maturity of the ERM system and the robustness of the entity's oversight and management.

 

Maintaining the status quo—that is, not connecting ERM with strategy and performance and not changing any business processes accordingly—may result in a critical failure that proves too costly for any company to bear, even in the most remote of scenarios. There are numerous examples of strategic corporate crises brought on by emerging risks that disrupted the organization's core business model. In other cases, unexpected low-probability but catastrophic events—"black swans"—have proven fatal to businesses when they do occur.

 

According to research conducted as part of the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants and North Carolina State University's Enterprise Risk Management Initiative for the 2017 Global Risk Oversight Report, companies find integrating risk into a strategy challenging. Fewer than 20% of organizations surveyed for the report in Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States believe their risk management processes provide a distinct competitive advantage. In addition, only about half of global respondents agreed with the statement, "Companies must consider risk exposures when evaluating new strategic initiatives." The research concludes a global disconnect between enterprise risk oversight and strategy execution.

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The upside of having corporate insurance

Image source: careinsurance.com When it comes to preparing for the worst possible thing that can happen to your corporate enterprise, Michael Saltzstein attests to the importance of having corporate insurance. Below explores some of its upsides. 1. Defense against lawsuits Don’t be too complacent and think that nobody will sue you, even when you know in your heart that you have not done anything wrong in your practice. The experts always consider reality as a litigious society. One disgruntled employee, one unhappy customer, or one small contractual error is all it takes for a lawsuit to be filed against you. Be humble enough to accept that you do not know everything, and be smart about preparing for unfortunate circumstances, suggests Michael Saltzstein. 2. Business credibility Having corporate insurance offers you protection from so many things. Also, news of your company having corporate insurance increases your overall credibility. Such an image makes you stand out a

Michael Saltzstein Discusses Dynamic Leadership

corporatefinanceinstitute.com Learning About Dynamic Leadership with Michael Saltzstein Michael Saltzstein has always believed that leadership is critical in the growth and expansion of a business. Strong direction inspires employees to do their best and produce quality results. Today, Michael Saltzstein talks about the positive effects of dynamic leadership. First, it's important to note that dynamic leadership means questioning everything in the spirit of improvement. Even if processes and systems have been tried and tested, active leaders still look for ways to improve them. They do so even if it means finding holes in these processes and systems. To these leaders, there is always room for improvement. Also, an influential director understands that there is no perfect system, and the improvement process is never truly complete. Dynamic leadership also always includes the rest of the team. Michael Saltzstein notes that passionate leaders seldom use the word "I" when dis

Michael Saltzstein on Advice for Huge Corporations

Michael Saltzstein Shares Insights for Big Companies articles.bplans.com Many young entrepreneurs can increase their business's net worth in this day and age. However, business owners need more than just grit and determination to lead their companies into a successful future.    Today, Michael Saltzstein looks at two important business strategies that can help a business grow and expand and ultimately have a more substantial net worth.  First, Michael Saltzstein says that business owners need to know how to take chances without risking the company. Most successful entrepreneurs have taken risks that ordinary people wouldn't have at one point or another. In fact, taking these risks has been a huge part of the company's success.   It's okay to risk money on things that may lead to growth and expansion -- well, as long as these are calculated risks and not risks borne from whims. It's also important to note that business owners need to consider and plan for most,