Skip to main content

Michael Saltzstein on Uniting Risk Management with Strategic Planning

Michael Saltzstein believes the ever-changing and ever-expanding needs of a business necessitate a thorough rethinking of the risk management process. A recent update to the COSO's enterprise risk management (ERM) framework offers new ideas on how companies can preserve their business's value, if not enhance it, by incorporating and examining risks from the strategy formulation stage.

 

This approach elevates ERM from an operational- and compliance-focused information-gathering and reporting model to a strategy-focused model that can add value to organizations. However, implementing the change is a challenge in and of itself, as organizations, particularly larger ones, are hesitant to redefine their existing ERM process without a precise cost/benefit analysis that demonstrates added value.

 

As Michael Saltzstein indicates, it’s important to address how risk management professionals can persuade decision-makers to incorporate risk management insights identified through the organization's ERM process into strategic planning.

 

Many would agree that adopting more sophisticated ERM systems improves corporate governance. In addition, there is a direct correlation between the maturity of the ERM system and the robustness of the entity's oversight and management.

 

Maintaining the status quo—that is, not connecting ERM with strategy and performance and not changing any business processes accordingly—may result in a critical failure that proves too costly for any company to bear, even in the most remote of scenarios. There are numerous examples of strategic corporate crises brought on by emerging risks that disrupted the organization's core business model. In other cases, unexpected low-probability but catastrophic events—"black swans"—have proven fatal to businesses when they do occur.

 

According to research conducted as part of the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants and North Carolina State University's Enterprise Risk Management Initiative for the 2017 Global Risk Oversight Report, companies find integrating risk into a strategy challenging. Fewer than 20% of organizations surveyed for the report in Europe, the United Kingdom, and the United States believe their risk management processes provide a distinct competitive advantage. In addition, only about half of global respondents agreed with the statement, "Companies must consider risk exposures when evaluating new strategic initiatives." The research concludes a global disconnect between enterprise risk oversight and strategy execution.

 

 

 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Michael Saltzstein Explores Practical Ways to Help Families Displaced by Wildfires

  Michael Saltzstein on How to Support Families Affected by Wildfires Wildfires often displace thousands of families, leaving them with little more than the clothes on their backs. The immediate aftermath of such disasters is challenging, with families facing the loss of homes, possessions, and a sense of security. Michael Saltzstein explains that w hile the road to recovery is long, communities and individuals can play a vital role in supporting those affected. From donating essential items to offering emotional assistance , there are many meaningful ways to help families displaced by wildfires.     Donate Essentials and Financial Aid   One of the most immediate needs for displaced families is access to essentials like clothing, food, and hygiene products. Local shelters and disaster relief organizations, such as the American Red Cross or local food banks, often coordinate donation drives to provide these necessities.     1. Financial Contributions  ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael Saltzstein Highlights Why Employees Create Silent Workarounds When Processes Don’t Work

    Michael Saltzstein Reveals How Silent Workarounds Reveal Deeper Process Failures In many workplaces, broken systems stick around not because no one notices, but because no one feels comfortable speaking up. Instead of raising concerns or challenging inefficient processes, employees often create quiet workarounds just to keep things moving. As Michael Saltzstein points out, these behind-the-scenes fixes aren’t signs of creativity or resilience. They are red flags that something important is missing, which is psychological safety.     A workaround may be as simple as using an unofficial spreadsheet instead of a clunky CRM or copying a coworker’s workflow to avoid dealing with red tape. While these silent fixes keep daily operations from stalling, they also mask inefficiencies and prevent systemic improvement.     Why Employees Stay Silent   The silence surrounding broken processes often stems from fear of being seen as negative, resistant, or difficul...
Post a Comment
Read more

Michael Saltzstein Explains How Cognitive Load and Decision Fatigue Hurt Workplace Productivity

  Michael Saltzstein on Cognitive Overload at Work Can Lead to Decision Fatigue Modern workplaces are filled with tasks, notifications and decisions that demand constant attention. While this environment may seem like a mark of efficiency, Michael Saltzstein mentions that it often masks a hidden cost: cognitive load and decision fatigue. These two psychological phenomena can silently erode productivity, well-being, and the ability to make sound choices throughout the workday.     Cognitive load refers to the mental effort required to process information and complete tasks. When this load becomes excessive, it overwhelms an employee’s ability to think clearly and retain important details . Combine this with the endless decisions many workers must make each day, from responding to emails to prioritizing meetings , and you have a recipe for burnout and poor judgment.     Decision Fatigue Builds Quietly   The average adult makes thousands of decisions dai...
Post a Comment
Read more